Subscribe to receive Slightly Sensible blog posts by email:

Your email:

Get a catalog!

Slightly Sensible - B&B Insider

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Common Sense Crumble?

  
  
I spent the better part of last week paddling and hiking about in the Boundary Waters - a pristine wilderness area between Minnesota and Canada largely accessible only by leg and paddle power. The Marconian magic of cellular doesn’t reach into the BW wilderness so this was a rare chance for a total disconnect from the rest of the world. I hope you’ve taken time this summer to recharge your batteries as well. It’s not too late, for most of us there are still some weeks of the best weather of the year left. Spend them wisely.

Now I’m back, batteries fully energized. But with a nagging thought that’s been rattling around my head for a few weeks now.

Common sense is in a state of decline.

I’m not just talking about running with scissors or even women’s footwear. I see it in engineering, medicine, finance, education and at an ever-accelerating rate in government. (It's little surprise that the closer you slide from the private sector to public the more likely this deficiency is to bubble to the surface.)

Lack of common sense isn’t a new phenomenon, but my concern is that our evolution as a species is breeding it. People are increasingly educated and specialized. We don’t have to hunt our food, build our shelter. We’ve gone to great lengths, at least in the western world, to eliminate the positive effects of Darwinism. Go back in time a thousand years or two and I suspect the survival rate of “stupid is as stupid does” was dramatically different than today.

In a wilderness area like the Boundary Waters, a lack of common sense could cost you dearly. Particularly if you’re a few days paddle from the nearest civilization. (We donated some extra food to a frazzled couple we crossed paths with who failed to tie up their food pack overnight and lost it all to a hungry bear.)

Scientists may argue that common sense is nothing but a set of prejudices that inhibit creative solutions. Very likely true, but reality requires balance. Try this litmus test. Would you rather be trapped on a desert island with a group of scientists or engineers? How about mechanics and technicians?

This all got me thinking about how to teach common sense. I can’t fix the government, but if common sense is teachable then I do have a circle of influence in my work and home life where I can make a difference and buck the trends here in my own little pond. And if you do it too, all 50,000+ of you, that circle grows immensely.

We can’t teach what we can’t define so I’ll start there. The ingredients of common sense seem simple.

1. In innate knowledge of the principals of your profession. We must acknowledge that success requires specialization and I’d rather have my doctor spend time becoming an expert on human anatomy than Maxwell’s equations. In engineering, regardless of discipline, it all starts with a deep understanding of classical physics.

2. Hands on experience, and the more experience with failure the better. In various interviews of new engineers I’ve rarely found talent from someone that describes their decision to enter the field because “I was good at math and like computers.” (If you’ve got a child in E-school, never, ever let them give an answer like that!).  I spent the better part of my childhood engineering failures of various magnitudes. And man did I learn a lot, including what I wanted to be when I grew up. Your professional career will not reward failure, so get as much of it in as early in life as possible.

3. The ability to simplify. Or perhaps better described is the ability to avoid the human ability to over complicate virtually anything. I have a great deal of respect for minds that can quickly delve through the layers of muck and minutia, separate fact from trivia, identify the core issue and communicate it in a few simple statements.
 
4. Remember the Scientific Method? Define the problem. Gather information. Make a hypothesis. Design and conduct a fair experiment to test your hypothesis. Analyze the data and draw a conclusion. Clearly communicate the results.

Simple. Works to diagnosing a disease, troubleshooting a circuit or tracking down a misfire in your car.  (In fact, your successful neighborhood mechanic may well be the local master of the scientific method – people that troubleshoot for a living have fantastic minds). I wish I could name examples of the Scientific Method being used in government – it seems largely absent, particularly here in Illinois.

As with any trend, there are numerous bright points and outliers. Over the last few years I’ve met many people, engineers and otherwise, with fantastic mastery of each of the 4 points above. These are energizing people to be around.

Back in the office there have been a few common sense items that came out and whacked me in the head in the last year that made it all the way to cool products.

Here are three that jump to mind.

First is our line of ultra-hardened serial converter products. Nobody on the planet makes more 232, 422, 485 converters and isolators than we do here at B&B Electronics. Literally hundreds to choose from, yet after almost 30 years in the business we didn’t have a single one in a rough and tumble metal enclosure until this year. (I visited a customer last year that said “I love your converters, but after a few years they start to melt” – machine shops have plenty of oil in their air that was tough on some plastics).  Common sense says metal is a good idea – better late than never and our manufacturing guys are busy keeping these on the shelves.

http://www.bb-elec.com/product_family.asp?FamilyId=642&s=20100643

(I see our web guru’s added a new feature on this page. Apps guru Mario has his photogenic mug shot on the page with some Q&A links that you really need to read if you’re a user of serial comms - or if you just want to put a face to Mario’s name).

Second, we’ve been building wireless modems and sensor products for a number of years now, watching many of you seal them in a weatherproof box for installation out on rooftops, tanks, towers (or even in a greenhouse surrounded by sprinklers). After seeing this over and over, we finally realized that life would be a lot easier for you if we just made our boxes waterproof – IP67 in fact. Now if you need to connect two serial devices or capture digital or analog sensor data from some remote location, Zlinx Xtreme makes it easier than ever. Just bolt it up, connect it and go.

Click here for wireless sensor and I/O:

http://www.bb-elec.com/product_multi_family.asp?MultiFamilyId=123&s=20100643

Click here for RS-232/422/485 radio modems:

http://www.bb-elec.com/product_multi_family.asp?MultiFamilyId=122&s=20100643

And here’s my last example of how a dose of common sense turned (eventually) into a great problem solver. We’ve taken hundreds of thousands of support calls from customers like you that are connecting all manners of RS-232, 422 or 485 devices. A good percentage of those calls are from industrial folks that are running Modbus protocol. In many of those calls, they need more than just a converter to get two Modbus devices talking. Sometimes they have to convert Modbus ASCII to RTU, or even Modbus TCP. Or they may need to remap a conflicting Modbus address – or even change a baud rate. The Vlinx Modbus Gateway family of converters solves those problems, and most any other Modbus connectivity problem you can think of.
 
http://www.bb-elec.com/product_multi_family.asp?multifamilyid=86&s=20100643

How is common sense fairing in your pond? Do you see any shining examples to prove me wrong? Talk back below.

Happy Connections,
Mike Fahrion

Comments

Mike,  
 
 
 
Relating to your item 3 above, I lay claim to what I call the Norman Definition of Genius. It is the ability to dredge out the simple things that make up apparently complex events or things. Newton's laws of motion are a wonderful example. Einstein's thought experiments are another. Mozart's music is absolute proof of this.  
 
 
 
The greatest minds of all time are those that can simplify, simplify, simplify.  
 
 
 
On a related matter, and one to which you alluded, there are minds that work hard to complicate, complicate, complicate. These people are called politicians. Their view is that we are all much too stupid to understand the things they are doing, so we are very fortunate to have their great minds in place to do our thinking for us.  
 
 
 
Thank you for your articles. May common sense always prevail, and may success constantly follow you.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:05 AM by Tom Norman
Mike, 
I have really strong feeling that we share more than political views and love of great hardware. 
 
But as to common sense, I've had a tagline on my email for the last ten years that proves itself everyday. 
 
The amount of intelligence on the planet is fixed... the population is growing. 
 
Kind of explains it all. 
 
Keep up the great work, I and a ton of Crestron dealers love your products.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:55 AM by Dan Gilstrap
I envy your trip to the Boundary Waters. I spent 2 weeks there with a group of other teenagers during the summer of 1962. Paddling, portaging and shooting some remarkable rapids. The memories are still vivid.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:57 AM by Igloo
Mike...seriously, dude, you should be writing a book. Not only do I find much to agree with and support in your musings, I find them inspirational in their simplicity and Truth. Thanks for fighting the good fight, for questioning, for having an opinion! Now what we need are folks like you running for office...but I'm sure you're entirely too sensible and sane. Ah, well. Enjoy the beautiful last of Summer and the advent of Fall...it's wonderful up here in Bellingham WA, too! Let me know when the book comes out..."All I Ever Needed to Know I Learned While Being an Electronics Guru". Take care and keep writing!
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:15 PM by Nevada S Huaute
Mike for President!!! Seriously, though, I reckon if Engineers ran things the world would not be in such a parlous state. Here in Australia we have an ex-telecom engineer who started a chain of electronics shops (which were great). He then sold out and they are not great any more. QED. He has better ideas for fixing the country than any of the politicians.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:55 PM by David Ashton
Your last two articles really have really been timely for me, as I've had my own recent awakening. Twenty five years down the road from a nuke engineering degree has brought me a long way from my ET beginnings at Great Lakes NTC. This hit me like a ton of bricks recently when my father-in-law gave me a large, sixties-era, AM/FM/SW Grundig radio (tubes). He said something like, “You're an old Navy ET; you won't have any problem getting' this up and running!” I wasn't completely honest when I replied, “No problem.” The gauntlet was thrown down. When I got home, I ordered up a schematic, found an o'scope on ebay, and dug out my old “A” & “C” school manuals. Decided I really needed to start at the beginning, so I added breadboard and a bag of basic components. It's all coming back quickly and I'm having a blast. Much more fun than reading QA procedures and dealing with the HR rep!  
 
Have a great day, I've got to go review the six-step trouble shooting method!
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 7:56 AM by Scott
One thing you left out is that "Common Sense" (or any kind of sense) is dependent on accepting reality as real. For instance, if you start with the belief that our President was born in Kenya or that our government blew up the World Trade Center, it's likely that your "Common Sense" ideas will turn out to be "Common Nonsense". 
 
 
 
Also, seeing as how no leopard has ever changed its spots, "Common Sense" should tell us that the politicians who tell us that they have changed theirs probably aren't being truthful.
Posted @ Sunday, September 19, 2010 5:11 PM by Niel
First, let me quote Paul Scherrer (the Swiss nuclear pioneer), Mike: 
«The main difficulty (against expectation) is not the complexity of the problem, but quite to the opposite the principle that "the functions of nature are so simple, more simple they cannot be". The reason lies in the fact that a very simple solution of a very difficult problem is immensly straining the mental apparatus while a complex, costly solution of the same problem does not strain the mind at all. Thus it is frightfully difficult to find frightfully simple solutions.»  
 
Then, based on ICS, ie "Informed Common Sense", let's call the working method LQSA, ie "Logical Qualifying System Analysis" & pose a frightfully simple example with frightfully complex consequences & then gratifyingly simple solutions:  
 
Any calendar reform requires the change of the earth's position & movement in space because it has to be released (for some minutes or hours) from being stabilized, when from its own unbalanced momentum it reels until in the grip of gravitation again. Such events, of course, cause global catastrophes, cf on just 1 page the irrefutable ICS test @ <a>http://www.sorces.li/ILGCR.pdf<a>. From this truth follows compellingly the fact that the historical as well as the natural sciences (as against historical & natural lore) are teaching fairy tales in order to repress the traumatising excitation background of those global catastrophes, the last series of which (the "Apocalypse") having ended in the middle of the Trecento, ie some 660 years ago with the LGJ, ie the up till now "Last Great Jolt" (some of this is covered in <a>http://www.sources.li/Apocalypse&Calendar.pdf<a>).  
 
& finally looking at the natural sciences as a consequence of observing with very cheap common sense instrument -- the GFMI "Gravitational Field Measuring Instrument which you can find @ <a>http://www.sources.li/Physical-Congress-2006.pdf<a> with proof @ <a>http://www.sources.li/GFMI-proof.pdf<a> -- you will find that gravitation is not a mathematical formula, as physics insist, but SGR, "Substance-relevant Gravitation Resonance" not just stabilizing & driving all heavenly bodies, but also transporting impuls & energy instantaneously, ie much-much faster than snail mail c (cf <a>http://www.sources.li/SGR-E.pdf<a>). All of which now in turn proves that the global catastrophes as reported by so-called myths or documented calendar reforms &&& are indeed owed to happily wandering planets, as even their appellation says: Homer exclusivelly uses "planos" for describing Ulysses' sly wandering. 
 
Thus you see the difference hiding between Technology & Engineering as opposed to Science & Theorizing: T&E can only make money by applying ICS so their products will work; while S&T are getting payed for repressing knowledge derived from observation & logic to collective memory hidden in language in thinking processes which might also become explained by SGR (any reader interested please don't mind asking me @ Besserwisser@sources.li). However, this repression of reality ends up in IBC, ie Irrational Behaviour of the Collective in Knowledge corruption, Holocaust, Terrorism, War, Destructive Technology & Econometrics (some of this @ <a>http://www.sources.li/Collective_Repression.pdf<a>). 
 
Well, Mike, that's it. Except if maybe your company is looking for future business along ICS judgement, you might think about employing GFMIs for predicting earthquakes, preventing deep sea drilling platforms to break, "Bermuda triangle" accidents, or the dancing of bridges, or you might even attempt to demonstrate to space industry that if they don't hurry up learning about SGR they might lose the race to Mars because of their antiquated scientific dogmas. Meanwhile, we might need some of your RS products, which I'll look up on your page.
Posted @ Monday, September 20, 2010 1:38 PM by Besserwisser
Mike, 
 
I always like to read your philosophical escapades that come as a wrapper for advertising your products. I am also a user of your products, however probably not in the quantities your average costumer is. Part of it may be due to the fact that I have worked my ways on the Apple Macintosh platform ever since the Mac was introduced in 1981. I have been content with them ever since. I do all my DAQ with LabVIEW making applications like this one: 
 
http://sine.ni.com/cs/app/doc/p/id/cs-599 
 
.. and yes ever so often I use devices that talks the serial way too. Anyway, a friend of mine who is engaged in the same activity as myself sent me a link to a video he taped. You might like to watch it and appreciate the physical content of it too: 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1BRxTz_P-s 
 
Although it may not appear this way, we nevertheless have some common sense after all too. We work in physics education for the public, employed by the public, because nobody else want's to finance and take the challenge to educate the public. Generally our students are the ones who will buy some of your products later on. 
 
Regards 
 
Urs 
 
Urs Lauterburg 
Physics demonstrator 
Physikalisches Institut 
University of Bern 
Switzerland 
 
PS: Common sense has always been a problematic. Why else would people build huge machineries to kill each other while vandalizing their environment rather consciously.
Posted @ Sunday, October 31, 2010 6:26 AM by Urs Lauterburg
You mentioned: "The Marconian magic of cellular" - I just need to point out that it was Tesla that patened Radio and discovered the laws of wireless transmission. Marconi was only a member of the audience when Tesla gave his talk of wireless transmissions. 
 
 
 
On a lighter note when are you going to produce the wireless transmitter of power that Tesla had perfected over a hundred years ago?
Posted @ Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:24 PM by Randy
Mike, welcome to the wonderful world of commuter cycling. It's a world largely of your own creation. That is, take pleasure in working out the kinks. When you drive a car, everything is decided for you. There's a button to press if you're too hot, too cold, too fast, too slow (oh wait, that one seems to be missing...) press this one if it rains, lights if it gets dark, and you should be in this lane not the one that's going where you want to be. On a bike, many problems are still unsolved, and for those who delight in seeking solutions, commuter cycling is a pleasure. On a good day, the sun, and the wind at your back, and the ability to keep moving past car drivers with grumpy faces gives you a feeling of omnipotence. And for problems like what to wear to keep from getting too hot/too cold, flat tires, and rain (it's insidious, gets into every nook and cranny -- much easier to ride in a snow storm, it brushes off) are amazing because, 1) they are not bad enough to actually stop you and, 2) if you didn't get it right today, you get to try again tomorrow. That is the real beauty of the commuter cyclist experience, is it's iterative. As an engineer, you might get 3 or 4 chances to revise your approach to a project before you need to get on with things. Post launch, you might get to version 1.4 before someone else gets a blank slate. Three years at my present job, I'm up over 500 iterations of the daily commute. A glance out the back door during breakfast tells me what kind of ride I'm having today, and how to pack for it. The most important thing you can do is find a good route. If you're riding the same road you would drive in your car, you need to do some exploring. Google Earth will reveal some possibilities (though locked gates are hard to see from space). 9/10 times, when you actually get there on a bike, you'll find there's a way to get through, a little path created by others before you. My route takes me through 3 neighborhoods, between farms, through "the cow tunnel" (no more cows -- been converted to a bike path under the highway) and I'm only on the highway for about a block before I turn into the industrial park. Oh, and carry a voice recorder. You think I'm kidding, but you will have amazing thoughts riding that are somehow impossible to recall when you've stopped. Biking is a unique head space, and you'll want to bring something back.
Posted @ Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:36 AM by Morgan Ahoff
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics